http://www.morphollica.com/hairloss_exp ... wer731.php
I think he's right... Even when hair cloning or hair multiplication becomes available, I think the results from regular hair transplants are still going to be better, aesthetically, than a 100% hair cloning implantation. I think it will still be many many years before it can completely replace hair transplants, if ever. Not that scientists can't figure it out, but it just might not be economically the way to go.... I hope I'm wrong.Question Asked By
jay
2005-12-05
Question Topic
hair cloning...
Question
I was wondering how far along experimentation with hair cloning has become. And when/if it will be available. Any information, url's, etc, would be great. thanks.
Answer
From the information we recieve at the conferences, unfortunately the progress with hair multiplication (commonly called "hair cloning") has been very very slow. The people 'in charge' are optimistic--as are the physicians (like me) who treat hair loss. Remember that the only picture of 'cloned' hairs is a very unsightly "tuft" of hair on the edge of a rat's ear from years and years ago--not very encouraging. The good news is that if you were on a treatment like Propecia early enough, you would not likely need a hair multiplication procedure. In my opinion, in the future, hair multiplication procedures will only be used for people who have limited donor areas (either from extensive hair loss or previous, old-style transplants). With today's technology that is currently available (Propecia plus properly performed follicular unit hair transplantation), most people should be able to easily reach their hair restoration goals. Let me know what other questions you have. Also, you might want to visit http://www.clonemyhair.com Sincerely, Dr. B. doctorb@baumanmedical.com
Sam